Capacity Building

Investment & Financial Flows (I&FF) Methodology (UNDP)

Building upon the UNFCCC's global, top down analysis of the costs of climate change, UNDP commissioned a User Guidebook to support developing countries to undertake a bottom-up, national sectoral analyses of the costs of adapting to the impacts of climate change and mitigating GHG emissions. The User Guidebook, which was developed by UNDP with a group of international experts and regional centres of excellence, comprises:

Fast Out of the Gate: How Developing Asian Countries Can Prepare to Access International Green Growth Financing (USAID)

The report reviews more than 200 public and private sector funds and mechanisms for financing projects, businesses, and infrastructure in the Asia region that mitigate emissions of greenhouse gases and thereby address climate change. The study aims to help Asian policymakers, public and private fund managers, banks, and even local communities identify ways to fund low-carbon development.

Shifting the Climate Finance Paradigm: Nine Key Challenges for Developed Countries (IIEA)

From 2010 to 2012, fast start finance began to flow from developed country exhequers. However, the climate finance paradigm is now shifting. A transition from loans and grants provided from scarce exchequer resources to innovative instruments for leveraging private capital and mitigating investment risk is required in the coming period.

The Role of National Development Banks in Catalyzing International Climate Finance (IADB)

This publication discusses the unique role that NDBs could play in scaling up private financing for climate change mitigation projects through the intermediation of international and national public climate finance in their respective local credit markets and the conditions that would be needed for them to be most effective. It draws from experiences in international climate finance and best practices, processes, and products of NDBs within the Latin American and Caribbean region.  

Climate Public Expenditure and Institutional Reviews (CPEIRs) in the Asia-Pacific Region – What Have We Learned? (UNDP)

This paper provides lessons learnt from the recent UNDP experience in implementation of Climate Public Expenditure and Institutional Reviews (CPEIRs). It also provides proposal for implementing future CPEIRs and undertaking complementary analyses.  

Climate Public Expenditure and Institutional Review (CPEIR) – Methodological note (UNDP)

This paper describes a new methodology that aims to inform the development of the national response to climate change: the climate public expenditure and institutional review (CPEIR). The paper outlines the analytical framework of this methodology. It draws on the experience of a substantial body of work that has examined the effectiveness of public expenditure through the use of several analytical tools.

Moving the Fulcrum: A Primer on Public Climate Financing Instruments Used to Leverage Private Capital (WRI)

Targeting public finance to leverage private sector capital can help meet the several hundred billion dollars of annual low-carbon investment required in developing countries. This working paper serves as a primer, demonstrating how the public sector can employ different types of public financing instruments — whether loans, equity, or de-risking instruments — alongside policy and technical support to scale-up private sector investment in low-carbon markets.

Tracking Climate Finance: What and How? (OECD & IEA)

To illustrate some of the key tracking issues, this paper presents examples of different types of funding for mitigation or adaptation activities in developing  countries. The examples demonstrate the complexity of financial flows for climate change action, across international and domestic as well as public and private flows. The examples also reflect questions and issues that negotiators may need to address when deciding which flows could be counted towards the $100 bn, e.g.

Global Protocol for Community-Scale GHG Emissions

The Global Protocol for Community-Scale GHG Emissions (GPC) resolves the differences between existing protocols. It is a joint mission between all interested stakeholders to develop an open, global protocol for community-scale accounting and reporting. Tis Protocol provides requirements and guidance for cities on preparing and publicly reporting a GHG emission inventory. The primary goal is to provide a standardized step-by-step approach to help cities quantify their GHG emissions in order to manage and reduce their GHG impacts.

Delhi Vision for the Green Climate Fund Business Model Framework: Some thoughts on access & disbursement

The reason for establishing a business model framework is to ensure the Green Climate Fund (GCF) is "fit for purpose" -- in other words, that it is able to achieve the goals and objectives set down in the Government Instrument. At the second meeting of the GCF in October 2012, the GCF Board began to work on developing a business model framework for the GCF. At the same meeting, India announced they would prepare a vision paper on this topic, to be introduced at the third GCF meeting in Berlin, March 2013.

Syndicate content